How This Investor Turned A Negatively Geared Property losing $1,000/month into a Positive Cash Flow Property making $580/month
I sent out an email recently asking my readers what they wanted to read about on the blog. I received many responses, many of them asking for two things. They asked for advice on how you can create positive cash flow from property and secondly they asked for real life examples of how people created positive cash flow properties.
I spend a lot of my time over at Steve McKnight’s PropertyInvesting.com Forums. These forums are a great place to chat with like minded people who are interested in investing in property. I love to go on the forums and help out wherever I can and whenever I have a question I can ask it and receive some great advice.
One of the users of this forum posted their story about how they took a property that was negatively geared (and eating them alive!) and turned it into positive cash flow. The best thing about this story is that is it real, it is simple and anyone can do it. No matter where you are investing or what kind of property you are investing in.
I could rephrase this story but I feel that it is best that you heard it straight from the horses mouth. I feel it has more impact that way. A big thanks to angelinsydney for allowing me to post this story.
I’ve made mistakes, big ones and small ones, a few to mention…. but I’ll relate one to you. If I tell all of them, you’d never hear the end of it.
The Unit, bow. Yes, a unit at Hunters Hill. I mentioned this to you guys in one of the threads.
Backstory: One year after divorce and just recovering from my seeming bankruptcy, I decided to plunge back into the market. Bad. Bad. Bad. To go back into the market so soon was bad but that’s not the half of it.
Making emotional decisions is BAD. Newbies, don’t invest when you’re depressed or in recovery. DON’T. In hindsight, I was making myself feel better for my failure to hold on to my marriage. Losing three properties through divorce was hard so I looked to compensate it with another. It was also probably true that there was an element of pride in it, “Look what I got.” Silly. Stupid.
Hard truths to swallow but if I mince words, it would be like I never learned from it.
Anyway, in hindsight, it wasn’t just an emotional decision, it was also “mathematically” stupid.
Back then, I was working as a mortgage broker, supporting four kids. Although ex-husband does not provide financial support we have split custody and he really does look after them when they’re with him. God bless him. So, straight away, child support was, and still is, a non-event. This was mutual agreement though, not his fault.
Secondly, mortgage broking means one month you’re rich and the next you’re just about ready to Q at Centrelink. It didn’t get that bad but close.
Thirdly, the property was heamorraging money. Trust me, I’m not exaggerating. It was heamorraging $1,000 a month. The quarterly strata fees were so high that I was paying equal to 14 months repayment.
There was a saving grace though because I always found fantastic tenants. Being Hunters Hill, you only got the cream of society as tenants. One repainted my unit, 3 X coating. Three!!! He was obsessive with perfection. And, believe you me, he ripped up the carpet and laid floorboards. He called me from Ikea and said, “I’m out of here, these floorboards are disgusting.” Went away and bought the most expensive floating floor boards in the market. He said he’s used to a certain lifestyle and must meet that standard. I only paid for the labour.
Anyway, negatively geared it was. I learned the lesson that you can’t eat negative gearing or depreciation. And when the kids wants something besides the basic survival needs- (food, water, housing… thank God for public schools or my kids would have had to consider schooling optional to their survival) you just have to say, “NO.”
Every time I despaired, I’d go for a walk at Hunters Hill. It’s such a beautiful place. I’d come home feeling better but my kids and I can’t eat the views.
Enter panic mode again. But no! Don’t panic. Think. After investigating all options, I found that vendor financing was the ideal solution. In 2006, I went in that direction and found myself making $580 a month, from negative $1,000 pm. So for three years, I was making a little money, instead of bleeding to a slow death.
I’ve had to “sell” for 0 capital gains as GFC hit. So folks, this is the kicker — after the “buyer” bought “refinanced” last year via bank loan, the capital growth sky-rocketted. Soon after RBA dropped the interest rate, the unit went up $110,000.
If you can hold on to your property it will eventually make you money BUT this strategy only works if you have the means to hold on to it. Clearly, negative gearing is, in itself, NOT a strategy. It is a BONUS. Holding to an asset only works if there’s “meat on the bone.” In my case, there were just tendons. 🙂
I tell you what though, I have no regrets. It was bought from me by a young man who was almost like a son to me. Secondly, by letting go of it, I got to fight another day. Look where I am now. Still standing and carrying on.
So you see, long-term investors make mistakes, too.
Hope this has enlightened someone.
Wow! What a great story. This investor turned a negative cash flow of $1,000 per month into a positive cash flow of $580/month. What a turn around. To make this more remarkable they did it during a dip in the property market. They didn’t get any capital gains, but they took a dud and made it into a winner none the less.
The best thing is that anyone can do this. You can do it in almost any city in Australia to almost any property. You can make almost any property you own generate a positive cash flow by selling on vendor finance terms.
This story makes me think that I desperately need to write a post explaining vendor finance in detail. Stay tuned.
"This property investment strategy is so simple it actually works"
Want to achieve baseline financial freedom and security through investing in property? Want a low risk, straightforward way to do it? Join more than 20,000 investors who have transformed the way they invest in property."